Oct 19th 2007 Compare: iPod Classic vs. iPod Nano
Most people, or may be its just me are wondering what is the deal with so many versions of the iPod being launched? They all serve the same purpose don’t they? People use the iPod to listen to music right? So what is all this hoo-ha about the iPod classic and iPod Touch? Do people really care?
Being an owner of the iPod Nano, a mere 2GB one at that, I am inclined to compare the iPod classic with the iPod Nano. And let me tell you that at the end of my research I did want to get my hands on the iPod Classic. First of all let’s start by talking about the display screen. Not as swanky as the multi touch display screen of the iPod Touch, the iPod classic has a 2.5-inch display screen which makes watching videos oh-so much fun. The iPod Nano certainly does not have any video options.
The storage space and the battery life of the iPod classic is its true selling point. With storage options of 80GB and 160GB the iPod Classic the iPod Classic makes storing music, videos, photos, movies and games so much more convenient. You can store your entire music collection along with everything else on this little power packed media player. The battery life is the best part. You can play 40 hours of non-stop audio playback and 7 hours of video playback with the 160GB iPod classic and 30 hours of audio and 5 hours of video on the 80GB iPod Classic. Completely perfect for those who travel for days.
Another thing that has drawn me towards the iPod Classic is its sleek design. Its sleek form, full metal enclosure and compatibility with other iPod accessories is what makes this version of the iPod a step above the iPod Touch. This is only because the iPod Touch is not compatible with any other iPod devices and that is a slight problem where uploading videos is concerned.
All in all, for its price of $250 or $350 for the 80GB and 160GB version, the iPod Classic is definitely one classy piece of equipment.
No Comments » Posted by Gregory / Features and Device